- Market report: Storm of disappointing developments keep investors cautious
- AFSIC – Investing in Africa – more than just a conference
- AFSIC interview with Chris Chijiutomi, MD & Head of Africa, British International Investment
- 18th Edition Connected Banking Summit – Innovation & Excellence Awards - West Africa 2024.
- AFSIC - 5 Weeks to Go - Join our Africa Country Investment Summits
Central Banks need Weird Barbies By Charles White Thomson, CEO, Saxo UK
In this commentary, Charles White Thomson, CEO at Saxo UK, explains how he wants institutions like the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee to have their own Weird Barbies so that we can break the cycle of groupthink.
Inspiration comes in strange places and as I sat watching Barbie, the charismatic Weird Barbie struck a chord with me. She reflects an antidote to group think, lethargy and the popular dumbing down at the institutional and individual level. For those who don’t know who Weird Barbie is, she is the Barbie whose hair is cut short and often has felt-tip pen drawing on her face. She is the opposite to the pristine Ken and Barbie – the individualists. She is the challenger, unbound by convention – where the child can express their individuality, or even frustration with the norm and to seek an alternative viewpoint. She is not weird, in the playground and raw sense of the word, she just thinks differently, and we need characters like this.
Rethinking economics
That is why I want institutions like the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee to have their own Weird Barbies so that we can break the cycle of group think. It is not just the Bank of England, it is many of the world’s Central Banks and other institutions who suffer from this. It has been a disappointing period for many of these institutions with key logic based on super cheap money in the form of quantitative easing (QE) and rock bottom interest rates and the resulting asset bubbles and inflation driving the existing counter measures. The view on transitory inflation is a classic example – the collective Central Banks filled to the brim with invincible Economists, many of whom are all trained in the same institutions, in the same money theory and who, in the majority, believed that inflation would return quickly to 2% because that is what happens and that is what the model says. Where was Weird Barbie’s voice?
Breaking the mould
To question these assumptions including calling out the huge liquidity in the system, increase in savings and the impact of initiatives like helicopter financing. Moreover, the transitory argument should be challenged and a different approach should be adopted. Weird Barbie adds those important ingredients of individuality and inquisitory nature, which for many classically educated Economists is uncomfortable, lowbrow and viewed as fringe. This is one of the reasons I would like a full review of our Monetary Policy and the performance of the Governor and the MPC to be carried out by ‘generalists’ as well as Economists. Going forward, the MPC and similar organisations should have a mix of Economists as well as Weird Barbies who should rejoice in their ability to think differently because it generates new thinking. No one likes a Weird Barbie who showboats for the sake of showboating. Swimming against the tide is not easy and that is why in the majority of cases, it is more common to have the consensus supporters than not.
Think Different
The individual investor also needs access to, or the ability to call on their own Weird Barbie, to test and challenge the status quo, traditional think including the opinion of some of our most revered institutions. This is also known as contrarian or differentiated thinking and can be applied to all parts of the investment process. An example would be where the Bank of England forecasts inflation at 2%. Weird Barbie would say , and I would agree with her, this is too specific and does not reflect potential shocks. A more likely scenario would be a spread of 2% to 5% allowing for better planning and the overlaying interest rate implications. Or, where consensus says this is a ‘no brainer’ or good idea – to then consider what is the other alternative or downside to the argument. How many times has the market upgraded and bought a stock or theme at the top of the cycle only to see it crash? This goes both ways and should also be applied when financial instruments are massively oversold or out of favour. Challenging rules and assumptions, listening to your intuition on a day to day basis are skills that Weird Barbie specialises in. Embrace your inner Weird Barbie or find one to help you. And for those who want to complete this analogy by doing the splits, make sure you train first. That one is for the true Barbie aficionados.