- Market report: Storm of disappointing developments keep investors cautious
- AFSIC – Investing in Africa – more than just a conference
- AFSIC interview with Chris Chijiutomi, MD & Head of Africa, British International Investment
- 18th Edition Connected Banking Summit – Innovation & Excellence Awards - West Africa 2024.
- AFSIC - 5 Weeks to Go - Join our Africa Country Investment Summits
McKinsey’s Sneader Says South Africa’s Eskom Was Overcharged
JOHANNESBURG (Capital Markets in Africa) – McKinsey & Co. has apologized to South Africa again over how business was handled with state-owned Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd., saying it overcharged the utility and was slow to admit wrongdoing.
The consulting firm admitted in October to failing to follow its own procedures while doing business with the power company when it worked alongside Trillian Capital Partners Pty Ltd., a business linked to the Gupta family. McKinsey reached a settlement last week to repay almost 1 billion rand ($74 million) in fees to Eskom.
“The trust of our clients and the public in South Africa is now, understandably, very low,” Kevin Sneader, global managing partner of McKinsey, said Monday at a business school in Johannesburg. “We did not communicate well enough how seriously we were taking this, or how sorry we were for our involvement.”
McKinsey became embroiled in claims that the Gupta family used their friendship with former President Jacob Zuma to win lucrative contracts from state companies, particularly through Eskom, which provides more than 90 percent of the nation’s electricity. The Guptas and Zuma deny any wrongdoing. Financial-services firm Trillian is linked to the Gupta family through business associate Salim Essa, who was its principal shareholder until he sold out.
Process Failure
Sneader, who became global managing partner at McKinsey this month, gave a speech at the Gordon Institute of Business Science to “confront our mistakes,” saying governance processes had failed and due diligence should have been done earlier. “They were not attentive enough to the fact that Trillian was a new entity or to the scale of the challenges facing Eskom,” he said.
The mistakes, illustrated over the past year as various investigations and reports emerged, have had a significant material effect on McKinsey’s business, Sneader said in an interview. Clients including Coca-Cola’s South Africa unit and petrochemicals company Sasol Ltd. have said they’re awaiting results from corruption probes before they’ll award new business to the firm.
While acknowledging that correct procedures weren’t followed, Sneader reiterated that a review of records including millions of emails and dozens of interviews showed there’s “no evidence our firm engaged in corrupt activity.”
In May, South Africa’s National Prosecuting Authority’s Asset Forfeiture Unit filed a lawsuit aimed at recouping 1 billion rand in consultants’ fees it said were unlawfully paid to McKinsey by Eskom, after talks with the U.S. firm about voluntarily repaying the money stalled.
“The fee was weighted towards recovering our investment rather than being in line with Eskom’s situation,” Sneader said. “In that context the fee was too large.”
Trillian was the so-called supply development partner of McKinsey in an agreement it had to provide services to Eskom until the relationship between McKinsey and Trillian ended in March 2016.
Source: Bloomberg Business News